WARNING: The following post contains dated advertisements that are politically incorrect and may be found offensive, shocking, or hilarious, depending on your personal beliefs. Same warning applies for the modern site.
Times are constantly changing and marketers must do their best to keep up, right? Out with the old and in with the new?
The vintage ads ranging from lipstick to kitchen appliances seem to violate every sensibility regarding gender roles that we live by today. However, these ads were completely acceptable and likely popular, and effective, when they were originally published.
The modern website for Mars’ Fling Chocolate Fingers depicts one modern marketing effort towards women. As opposed to being the brunt of jokes, Fling uses an overwhelming amount of suggestive language (“a ménage of flavors” “sneak in a quickie” “any time is the right time for a FLING”) to market towards women.
I began writing this post with the intent to compare the two methods and show progress and changes in marketing towards women over the last several decades, but now I’m not so sure. How big is the difference between eating a “naughty” chocolate bar or having a “fling in the bedroom”, and “the harder a wife works, the cuter she looks” or “the brightest jewel of all can be your lips…”?
The shift in method appears to be from bold to subtle, with the underlying message varying only slightly. Do you think objectification will continue in advertisements? What shifts or changes could marketing towards women take?
